Ethical Considerations in AI: Addressing Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol1.n1.p138Keywords:
Ethical considerations, Bias, Fairness, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Data preprocessingAbstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies has brought about unprecedented advancements in various domains. However, concerns surrounding bias and fairness in ML models have gained significant attention, raising ethical considerations that must be addressed. This paper explores the ethical implications of bias in AI systems and the importance of ensuring fairness in ML models. It examines the sources of bias in data collection, algorithm design, and decision-making processes, highlighting the potential consequences of biased AI systems on individuals and society. Furthermore, the paper discusses various approaches and strategies for mitigating bias and promoting fairness in ML models, including data preprocessing techniques, algorithmic transparency, and diverse representation in training datasets. Ethical guidelines and frameworks for developing responsible AI systems are also reviewed, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement to address bias and fairness comprehensively. Finally, future directions and challenges in advancing ethical considerations in AI are discussed, underscoring the ongoing efforts required to build trustworthy and equitable AI technologies.
Downloads
References
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias. In Ethics of data and analytics (pp. 254-264). Auerbach Publications.
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of theSelvakumar Venkatasubbu transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. new media & society, 20(3), 973-989. [3.] Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: focus on clinicians. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(6), e15154. [4.] Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671- 732.
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., and Roth, A. (2018). Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art. Sociological Methods and Research, 47, 175–210.
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 4349-4357.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 77–91.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
©2024 All rights reserved by the respective authors and JKLST.



