Changes in First-Year English-Majored Students’ Paragraph Writing Performance During a Blended Course at a Public University in Hanoi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol5.n3.003Abstract
This research examined changes in the paragraph-writing performance of 32 first-year English-majored students during a blended course at a public university in Hanoi. A single-class pre-test/post-test design was used. Following baseline assessment and orientation in Weeks 1–2, students completed blended activities from Weeks 3-10, combining asynchronous preparation on Google Classroom with face-to-face instruction, guided practice, peer interaction, drafting, and feedback. The post-test was administered in Week 11, followed by an 11-item questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with three purposively selected students in Week 12. Paired-samples t-tests indicated a significant increase in overall writing scores, with significant changes in content, organization, and grammar but not vocabulary. The questionnaire scales showed high internal consistency, and students reported favourable perceptions of engagement, motivation, confidence, and autonomy. Interview accounts illustrated perceived improvements in organization while also identifying distraction, unclear instructions, comprehension difficulties, and access constraints. Overall, higher post-test scores were observed after eight weeks of substantive blended instruction. However, the single-group design cannot isolate the contribution of blended learning from regular instruction, practice, feedback, task familiarity, or maturation.
Downloads
References
[1] J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya, Eds., Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[2] D. Y. Erkan and A. Saban, “Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL,” Asian EFL Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 164-192, 2011.
[3] D. R. Garrison and H. Kanuka, “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95-105, 2004.
[4] S. Hrastinski, “What do we mean by blended learning?” TechTrends, vol. 63, pp. 564-569, 2019.
[5] C. R. Graham, “Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions,” in The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, Eds. San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer, 2006, pp. 3-21.
[6] D. R. Garrison and N. D. Vaughan, Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
[7] D. Adas and A. Bakir, “Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 254-266, 2013.
[8] A. Challob, N. Bakar, and H. Latif, “The effect of using blog peer feedback on enhancing Iraqi EFL students’ writing performance and reducing their writing apprehension,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1340-1348, 2016.
[9] R. A. Rasheed, A. Kamsin, and N. A. Abdullah, “Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, vol. 144, Art. no. 103701, 2020.
[10] N. T. Bui and H. H. Vu, “Vietnamese students’ attitudes towards a flipped classroom model in English writing,” VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 74-89, 2020.
[11] A. Savage and M. Shafiei, Effective Academic Writing 1: The Paragraph. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[12] D. E. Zemach and C. Islam, Writing in Paragraphs: From Sentence to Paragraph. Oxford, U.K.: Macmillan Education, 2007.
[13] A. D. Cohen, Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom, 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Heinle & Heinle, 1994.
[14] R. Boelens, B. De Wever, and M. Voet, “Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review,” Educational Research Review, vol. 22, pp. 1-18, 2017.
[15] Nafiseh Hosseinpour, Reza Biria, and Ehsan Rezvani, “Promoting Academic Writing Proficiency of Iranian EFL Learners through Blended Learning,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 99-116, 2019. doi: 10.17718/tojde.640525.
[16] C. Banditvilai, “Enhancing students’ language skills through blended learning,” Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 220-229, 2016.
[17] Meihua Liu, “Blended Learning in a University EFL Writing Course: Description and Evaluation,” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 4, no. 2, 2013. doi: 10.4304/jltr.4.2.301-309.
[18] A. Burns, “Action research,” in Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction, J. Heigham and R. A. Croker, Eds. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, pp. 112-134.
[19] A. Burns, Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2010.
[20] F. M. G. Camahalan and A. G. Ruley, “Blended learning and teaching writing: A teacher action research project,” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 13, pp. 1-13, 2014.
[21] S. Hussin, N. Maarof, and J. D’Cruz, “Sustaining an interest in learning English through blended learning,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 211, pp. 173-177, 2015.
[22] B. Philipsen, J. Tondeur, N. P. Roblin, S. Vanslambrouck, and C. Zhu, “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 67, pp. 1145-1174, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
©2024 All rights reserved by the respective authors and JKLST.
