Adapting Agile Methodologies to Incorporate Digital Twins in Sprint Planning, Backlog Refinement, and QA Validation

Authors

  • Mohammed Majid Bakhsh Master of Science in Information Technology, Washington University of Science & Technology (WUST), Alexandria, Virginia, USA Author
  • Gazi Touhidul Alam Master of Science in Business Analytics, Trine University, Allen Park, MI, USA. Author
  • Nusrat Yasmin Nadia Master of Science in Information Technology, Washington University of Science & Technology (WUST), Alexandria, Virginia, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.v4.n2.006

Abstract

Agile approaches, which offer flexibility, iterative development, and constant feedback, have emerged as the mainstay of contemporary software and hardware development. However, managing dependencies, correctly forecasting system behavior, and evaluating features under real-world circumstances are all difficult tasks for traditional agile approaches. Real-time simulations, predictive analytics, and automated testing are made possible by digital twins (DTs), which are virtual representations of digital or physical systems. The three essential agile processes of sprint planning, backlog refinement, and QA validation are examined in this paper along with how DTs might improve them.

By adopting Digital Twins, Agile teams may achieve more exact sprint predictions, risk-based backlog prioritization, and automated QA validation. DTs' capacity to model task allocation and foresee system restrictions helps in sprint planning. DT-driven dependency analysis and dynamic risk assessment enhance backlog refinement, guaranteeing that priority is in line with practical viability. Lastly, by offering virtual testing environments that identify flaws before to deployment, digital twins transform QA validation.

This study synthesizes insights from existing literature, industry case studies, and empirical evidence to propose an integrated Agile-Digital Twin framework. The findings suggest that organizations implementing DTs within Agile practices experience enhanced efficiency, reduced technical debt, and improved product quality. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, integration complexity, and skill gaps must be addressed. The paper concludes by highlighting future research directions, including AI-powered Digital Twins for Agile optimization and the role of DTs in DevSecOps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., ... & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Retrieved from https://agilemanifesto.org/

Islam, S. M., Bari, M. S., & Sarkar, A. (2024). Transforming Software Testing in the US: Generative AI Models for Realistic User Simulation. Journal of Artificial Intelli-gence General science (JAIGS) ISSN: 3006-4023, 6(1), 635-659.

Choetkiertikul, M., Dam, H. K., Tran, T., & Grundy, J. (2018). Predicting delivery capa-bility in iterative software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(6), 551-573.

Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213-1221.

Bari, M. S., Sarkar, A., & Islam, S. (2024). AI-augmented self-healing automation frameworks: Revolutionizing QA testing with adaptive and resilient automa-tion. Advanced International Journal of Mul-tidisciplinary Research, 2(6).

Farsi, M., Daneshkhah, A., Hosseinian-Far, A., & Jahankhani, H. (Eds.). (2020). Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities. Springer.

Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The ag-ile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28-35.

Fowler, M. (2018). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code (2nd ed.). Ad-dison-Wesley Professional.

GE Digital. (2020). Digital twin: Creating value from data. Retrieved from https://www.ge.com/digital/applications/digital-twin

Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, & A. Alves (Eds.), Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems: New findings and ap-proaches (pp. 85-113). Springer.

Humayun, M., Gang, D., & Cullen, A. J. (2020). Incorporating digital twin in agile software development to enhance project performance. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(12), e2286.

Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Global soft-ware engineering and agile practices: A sys-tematic review. Journal of Software: Evolu-tion and Process, 24(6), 643-659.

Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36-52.

Leffingwell, D. (2018). SAFe 4.5 reference guide: Scaled Agile Framework for lean en-terprises. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939-948.

Rubin, K. S. (2012). Essential Scrum: A practical guide to the most popular agile process. Addison-Wesley.

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum Guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Retrieved from https://scrumguides.org/

Siemens. (2021). Digital twin: Realize inno-vation. Retrieved from https://new.siemens.com/global/en/company/sto-ries/research-technologies/digitaltwin.html

Tao, F., & Qi, Q. (2019). Make more digital twins. Nature, 573(7775), 490-491.

Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on In-dustrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405-2415.

VersionOne. (2022). 16th annual state of ag-ile report. Retrieved from https://stateofagile.com/

Yasrab, R., MacDonell, S. G., & Buchan, J. (2020). Predicting the impact of agile prac-tices on project outcomes: An industrial survey. Information and Software Technolo-gy, 121, 106270.

Downloads

Published

15-05-2025

How to Cite

Bakhsh, M. M., Alam, G. T. ., & Nadia, N. Y. . (2025). Adapting Agile Methodologies to Incorporate Digital Twins in Sprint Planning, Backlog Refinement, and QA Validation. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 4(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.v4.n2.006